注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

南桥的博客

Be the change you want to see.

 
 
 

日志

 
 

Learning about the Chinese Mind through Chinese Food  

2010-01-16 00:24:15|  分类: English |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
This may not be a profound truth that I just discovered, but have you noticed that Chinese food and Chinese thinking have a lot to do with each other?  Obvious as it may seem, one becomes reflective about it only after encounters with another type of food and thinking behind it. In my case, the comparison is between China and America.

1. In cooking we don't have "1 cup", "1/4 cup", "1 teaspoon" measurement, we say "a little salt". Exactly how little is little, it's all a matter of exposure (to other cooks), exchange (of experience) and experience (of your own practice). We don't have "preheat oven to 425 degrees" either, we say "small fire", "medium fire", ""big fire". Scratch your head and think what these mean. The Chinese mind is similarly conditioned to process such chaotic vagueness with ease and patience.

2. When Americans eat meat, it's a huge chunk of steak or meat loaf. When they eat vegetables, it's salad that is made of things strictly from the green kingdom. Not us, we are omnivorous beings! We mix beef, beans, green onions (and in my case liberally applied hot pepper), all together, stir fry them. It's supposed to be more balanced and healthy. That's why my weight has been staying the same for 18 years. When we think, we tend to see things as coming together instead of being separate entities. This has bad and good impact on the way we think. Sometimes it causes us to be more holistic thinkers, going fluidly from one thing to another with ease, but there might be risk for sloppy thinking, which I certainly do not encourage.  I think a person can strive to be both holistic and rigorous, or remain rigid and sloppy. In science for instance, some Chinese scientists, if not trained in other methods, tend to see different things at the same time without clearly separating variables. I see this a lot when I review a Chinese journal. These authors add one thing after another into a topic the way we eat from a hot pot. Such ways of thinking can be detrimental (for instance in some quantitative studies) or beneficial (for instance in some qualitative studies), depending on the context. It is similar in medicine. Traditionally (before western medicine took the upper hand) traditional Chinese doctors would frown upon their colleagues who treat a pain in the head by examining just the head (for instance, an MRI of the head). We see the human body as an interconnected whole that is bigger than the sum of all the parts. A Chinese doctor may think, maybe that has something to do with a kidney problem. Would you please stick out your tongue so that we can make sure it is a kidney problem?

3. A typical Chinese kitchen has bowls, plates, chopsticks, knives, chopping boards, spoons, not many more beyond that. We use chopsticks for all sorts of things, even to drink soup, if you know how (you pick up your bowl and drink from there and use chopsticks to pick up the solid stuff). But of course, now few people do that for fear of impressing people as being not "civilized" (to me it is more a difference in the perception of table manners. In China, you are considered rude if you take the "upper seat" in a table that is reserved for seniors.) American kitchens have all kinds of tools, each dedicated to its special purpose. Most of these purposes are mysterious to me. For instance, there is a long tube-like sucker which I later learned is a tool to suck away extra gravy when cooking turkey. After 7 years in America, I still don't distinguish between a regular spoon and a soup spoon. I can recognize only half of the tools in the kitchen. Once an American friend gave us a box full of kitchen stuff when they moved away. We didn't know what most were and we gave some to our Chinese friends and they didn't know what they were either and they passed them on to somebody else. Since the Chinese community in the small town is not large, soon these fancy and unfamiliar tools made their rounds back to me. Chinese folks depend less on specialized tools when we think. We now do, by learning from the west. Hence things like the Balanced Scorecard, SWOT analysis, Fishbone analysis, Gagne's 9 instructional events and what not.

4. Chinese do not learn cooking by reading recipes. We mainly watch someone (mom, grandma, wife) do it and that's how we learn. Even now, living in the US, we learn in similar ways, sharing mainly in experience-based oral tradition. For instance we have a potluck together and we exchange ideas on how to cook, say, Dongpo Pork. We do have recipes, but most of them are useless anyway, as they seem to lack the kind of precision Americans need to learn, which is good, because otherwise most Chinese restaurants would be forced to shut down.  Now, thirty years after China's opening up, Americans still have not learned to cook the Beijing Duck.  Neither have I learned to cook turkey, as I don't read recipes.   Americans cook by reading recipes. If the recipe is lost, the cook goes nuts. To generalize from here, I think this also summarizes the difference in the passing of expertise in China and in America. In China, people learn more by following experts and try to internalize the expertise through observation, practice, error and mistakes. Americans do that too, but my observation is that people are more used to reading instructions, all the way from putting together a toy to the installation of softwares. This generalization may be equally related to individual learning styles rather than national differences. However, as someone in education, I often find myself going back to my Chinese roots when I hear Americans talk about "cognitive apprenticeship" (learning from your grandma, not a recipe), "peer learning" (learning from discussions in a Chinese potluck party, whereas an American housewife would just ask "could you please give me the recipe?"), etc. While these theories seem leading edge in the US education circles, we have been doing these for thousand of years, without, of course, verbalizing them into theories.

5. When Chinese food is being cooked, salt, sugar, vinegar, and other ingredients and spices and sauces are already added in the food, so good luck getting the food to your taste. If you like cliches, they are all collectivist, communist types of food! Americans tend to make their food more bland to start with, and you add salt, pepper, and sugar yourself later on to make it more personalized. When Chinese think, we tend to be more collective in the choice of subjects, perspectives, and topics. You start from the forest and zoom in to the trees if needed. You start basically from a common "whole". Americans seem to be more individualized in the way they approach things. Education is a typical example. I see there is much more flexibility in the US system. In China, even at the college level, there is much focus on a common knowledge base. Again, it is hard to say which is better.

6. Oh, dessert. Chinese don't have a tradition of eating dessert. Because desserts are too sweet, often people balance it with something bitter, such as coffee. To have coffee, some have sugar, some have cream, some have vanilla, etc. Life just gets so exponentially complex from there! We just drink tea! Green leaves and hot water. That's it. You can drink that thing for hours and sit there, talk about food, stock market, a book, or simply gossip about something or someone. Imagine drinking 10 cups of coffee in a row! You can easily drink 10 cups of tea without upsetting your stomach. Chinese view with caution the extreme sweetness and bitterness as shown in dessert and coffee. We value a more moderate approach to sweetness. Good things are good because there is something not so good in them to show how good the good things are (quite a mouthful). Happiness comes after we have gone through and overcome difficulties. You don't just take sweetness in its entirety and purity such as a chocolate cake! In terms of thinking, as a general rule, we traditionally value what we call "zhong yong zhi dao" (the way of the golden balance). These are all changing now with people adopting extreme left or right positions. I like American dessert more and more, yet I am not giving up my green tea! No sir!

I'll add more in the future. I am done with today's share of gross generalizations.
  评论这张
 
阅读(2313)| 评论(4)
推荐

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017